For some time now educrats at ACARA have been working on a new Australian Curriculum.
English, Maths, Science and History were covered in Phase 1 and are pretty much done and dusted. Phase 2 is now underway looking deeply at Languages, Geography and The Arts. Phase 3 is set to cover design and technology, health and physical education, ICT, economics, business and civics and citizenship.
ICT competence is listed as a general capability along with literacy and numeracy. Let's be clear, this is a Good Thing. But is it enough?
Should ICT be a distinct learning area? Should it be included with Design and Technology under the general heading 'Technologies'? That's what seems to be under consideration at the moment.
The Australian Council for Computers in Education (ACCE) has just released a position paper and is seeking comments on their website.
http://acce.edu.au/nationalcurriculum
What do you think?
I think ICT is more like maths, arts and science than woodwork, cooking, jewellery making and textiles.
I do see a facet of the old 'trades' in ICT - there are profoundly technical hands-on elements to the body of knowledge encompassed in ICT technology. ICT certainly requires design and development skills and methods.
So maybe "Technologies" is right. But it doesn't feel right.
What about algorithmic or computational thinking? What about learning the basic skills needed to create ICT, not just use it?
ICT is not just about responding to a design brief - it's about dreaming the design in the first place. It's about making our lives easier and connecting us to each other. It's about solving problems using our brains, and getting machines to amplify, disseminate, sort and store our thoughts.
I know, I know. I'm probably just hopelessly idealistic and naive. But to me ICT seems very very different to woodworking, cooking and textiles.
Personal computers were only just being introduced when I was at school - now they are an integral part of all our lives. I think we should all give some thought to the place of ICT in the new Australian Curriculum.
We should talk about it. Debate it.
Get involved.
Hi Donna,
ReplyDeleteI agree, ICT should be mandatory as a subject as it's so prevalent in the workforce and generally.
I'm not sure that providing every kid with a computer is the way to go, however. Having taught high school myself I would be more inclined to spend less on the hardware and more on the pedagogy (and decent facilities). Just my two cents worth.
Regards,
Grant Bailey
Hi Grant - sorry for the slow reply! nearly 2 years late - I only just discovered the hidden comment moderation section of blogspot!
DeleteAs I mentioned below to Carol - now the draft curriculum has been released it's a great opportunity to review it, and have a say in how this critical area of learning is brought into schools in the future!
Sign up on http://consultation.australiancurriculum.edu.au/register to review the draft and have a say!
Hi Donna,
ReplyDeleteI also agree that ICT should be a mandatory subject. I would actually take a step further and put in a separate learning area rather than lumping it in the 'Technology strand'. With the widespread applications and everyday usage of ICT across such a wide cross section of subjects, I believe it needs to be made a larger priority.
Regards,
Carol Burns
Thanks for your comment Carol :)
DeleteThe Draft "Digital Technologies" Subject for the Australian Curriculum was released last week! It IS now a stand alone subject with the Technologies learning area - this is in addition to Information and Communications Technology's standing as general capability.
The difference between the subject, and the general capability has been described as being the difference between learning how to use technology, and how to develop and create technology.
This is very exciting. But there's still a lot of work to do to refine and finesse this draft.
Check it out here:
http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Draft_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_Technologies_paper_-_March_2012.pdf